Resource Center

Roughly three in four cancer survivors report cognitive difficulties after treatment, and three in four of those want help for it — but one widely cited study found only 3% had ever received cognitive support. A newly published oncologist's guide shows how survivorship programs can close that gap without adding staff.

A 2026 study of young breast cancer survivors found that fewer than half of those on endocrine therapy had a recent bone density scan — the lowest adherence rate of any preventive measure tracked. Here's how survivorship programs can close that gap without adding staff.

At The After Cancer, we looked at quality-of-life check-ins from members of our community, using the FACT-G scale, a validated instrument for measuring well-being across physical, social/family, emotional, and functional domains.

Watch the full recording of our Expert Insight Session on Head & Neck Cancer Survivorship: Provider and Patient Perspectives.

A 2026 JAMA Oncology commentary says effective obesity therapies remain underused in cancer survivors who face elevated recurrence and cardiometabolic risk. Here's how survivorship programs can screen and refer at scale, without becoming a weight-loss clinic.

New 2026 clinical guidance points to inconsistent cardiovascular follow-up for cancer survivors. Here's how health systems can close the gap with a risk-stratified, scalable surveillance pathway.

A practical framework for turning patient-reported outcomes into scalable survivorship support, not another clinical inbox.

Financial hardship can persist long after treatment ends. Here is how survivorship programs can identify risk, connect survivors with appropriate support, and track follow-through without creating another labor-intensive workflow.

How AnMed's Cancer Support Services team is meeting Commission on Cancer survivorship standards and giving patients a year a self-directed way to engage with survivorship care.

A scalable framework for adherence support, symptom monitoring, education, and escalation when cancer treatment moves from the clinic into the patient’s daily life.

Watch this Expert Insight Session on how survivorship care plans can move beyond compliance to become practical, patient-centered tools that support life after cancer.

A practical framework for moving from needs assessment and referral to documented engagement, follow-up, and measurable survivorship outcomes.

Why survivorship resources often go unused, and how oncology teams can turn referrals into meaningful, measurable patient engagement.

Discover the latest survivorship research from ASCO 2026, including new findings on weight management, pain, physical activity, mental health, and technology, and what they mean for oncology teams and survivorship programs.

Hormonal changes, sexual health concerns, weight gain, emotional distress, and menopause symptoms are among the most common issues experienced by female cancer survivors.

Cancer treatment impacts all aspects of women's health

Why exercise is one of the most powerful—and underused—interventions in survivorship, and how health systems can implement it at scale

A practical framework for providers and health systems

Physical Activity in Survivorship: The Most Underused Treatment

The recent Becker’s Oncology article, “Why cancer survivorship care needs a redesign, per 10 leaders,” calls for a fundamental shift from episodic treatment to comprehensive, longitudinal survivorship care

Digital tools are increasingly being explored as a way to support patients after cancer treatment—but how do clinicians actually feel about them?

Unique insights about Survivorship in 2026: what is on an Oncologist’s wish list?

Extend survivorship services by referral and digitally, track participation automatically, and support the 4.8 annual report, without expanding staff.

Why chronic pain after cancer highlights rural health disparities—and the urgent need to expand evidence-based survivorship care beyond urban cancer centers.

How oncology programs can screen, triage, and treat fear of recurrence using stepped-care pathways—without overwhelming limited psychosocial capacity.

Cancer deaths are falling—but the systems to support life after treatment haven’t scaled.

How to turn lifestyle advice into measurable survivorship services that improve long-term outcomes—without adding major workload to clinical teams.

How oncology practices can turn survivorship guidelines into repeatable services: surveillance, late effects pathways, prevention, psychosocial care, and SCP delivery.

The next generation of survivorship models: stratify recurrence risk, anticipate late effects, and use digital tools to deliver the right care to the right survivors.

A practical look at the capacity mismatch driving survivorship shortfalls—and the care models health systems are adopting to deliver survivorship at scale.

A lean compliance model for small cancer programs—meet CoC standards, document smarter, and scale survivorship without new hires.

A scalable survivorship model for understaffed cancer programs—standardize pathways, shift routine care to shared models, and automate the repetitive work.

Supporting oncology clinicians with practical strategies to prevent burnout, process grief, and protect emotional wellbeing.

A practical conversation for clinicians on symptoms, tools, and referrals after cancer treatment.

A clinician-focused discussion on integrating therapy into survivorship care and follow-up.

Clinician-ready mindfulness tools you can recommend to support stress relief in survivorship care.

Practical insights for survivorship teams expanding access through virtual support and community partnerships

Evidence-informed insights for oncology teams on implementing peer-to-peer support programs.